Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04223
Original file (BC 2013 04223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04223

	XXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 28 Mar 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was injured while taking the contested FA, he sought medical attention that same day but his scores were unjustly entered into the AFFMS.  

In support of his appeal the applicant submits a Medical Determination letter, signed by his medical provider on 15 Aug 13, which states, “It has been determined there was a medical condition, in my opinion, that precluded him from achieving a passing score.”

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On the date of the contested FA the applicant was serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Airman First Class (E-3).

On 28 Mar 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA, attaining an overall composite score of 60.90, which constituted an “unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with the following component scores: Cardio – 15:00/27.10, Abdominal Circumference – 35”/20.00 points, Push-ups – 45/7.70 points, Sit-ups – 42/6.00 points.

On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “The applicant's injury was not validated by the applicant's medical provider.  Also, there was no indication the commander wanted to invalidate the Fitness Assessment.”

In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM3 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within 5 duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider/MLO and the Exercise Physiologist.  If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change the contested FAs in AFFMS due to lack of supporting evidence.  DPSIM states, the applicant provided a memorandum from his Primary Care Manager (PCM) supporting his claim. However, he did not provide documentation from the Unit Commander indicating his decision to invalidate the FA in accordance with AFI 36-2905, (AFGM3), paragraph 13, (20 Dec 10).

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 7 Mar 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  While the applicant has provided a letter from his medical provider indicating he had a medical condition, he has not met his burden of proving the contested FA should be removed from his records. In this respect, we note the applicant’s submission does not contain sufficient documentation to include; support from his commander requesting the FA be invalidated; AF Form 422 exempting him from the contested FA; or the Fitness Screening Questionnaire he was required to complete prior to completing the assessment. Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request.  However, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04223 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

		Mr. XXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
		Mr. XXXXXXXXX, Member
		Mr. XXXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04223 was considered:

		Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Sep 13, w/atch.
		Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 6 Jan 14, w/atchs.
		Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Mar 14.




                                   XXXXXXXXX
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04883

    Original file (BC 2013 04883.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal the applicant submits; an Emergency Care Center Discharge, signed by his medical provider on 1 Aug 13, which indicates the applicant was diagnosed with “weakness and low phosphate.” Additionally, he includes the following supporting documentation: Result sheet for the contested FA, DD 422 Notification of Members Qualification Status dated 27 Sep 12 and 26 Sep 10 indicating he was exempt from push-ups, FA history, excerpts from his medical record, and a letter from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03347

    Original file (BC 2013 03347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM3 (3 Jan 12), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. The FSQ should be completed no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05948

    Original file (BC 2012 05948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05948 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 4 Jan 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04200

    Original file (BC 2013 04200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a pre-existing medical condition, which should have placed him on profile during the contested FA In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a Medical Determination letter, signed by his medical provider on 30 Apr 13, which states the applicant “had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test.” The applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02337

    Original file (BC 2013 02337.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02337 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 Dec 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of her appeal she submits an AF Form 469 Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 11 Mar 13, indicating she...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04882

    Original file (BC 2013 04882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Feb 12 his commander requested base medical evaluate him. The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. In this respect, we note the applicant’s submission does not contain sufficient documentation to include; support from his commander requesting the FA be invalidated; AF Form 422 exempting him from the contested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04196

    Original file (BC 2013 04196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Recommend invalidation of FA in question.” A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant should not have completed the FA due to injury. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.” In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., “All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4).” In accordance with guidance at the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00431

    Original file (BC 2013 00431.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends the associated EPR be voided if the associated FAs are invalidated, as it appears the EPR was a result of the FA failures. Consequently, based on our above determination and since AFPC/DPSID has indicated the report should be removed in its entirety if the Board determines the FA failures should be invalidated, we recommend the referral EPR be declared void and removed from his records. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01340

    Original file (BC 2013 01340.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 01 Apr 2013 85.00 Satisfactory 11 Oct 2012 100.00 Excellent *10 Aug 2012 81.00 Unsatisfactory 15 Feb 2012 95.75 Excellent 17 Jun 2011 86.00 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 24 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence to support contention.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03968

    Original file (BC 2013 03968.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 29 Aug 13 95.75 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio) *30 May 13 37.00 Unsatisfactory (0 Points for Cardio) 29 Nov 12 76.30 Satisfactory 5 May 12 84.90 Satisfactory 5 Jan 12 98.50 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, Paragraph b, “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury and provides...